Tuesday, October 10, 2017

NFL Commissioner says players should stand (from Washington Post)

Roger Goodell says NFL believes players should stand during national anthem

  

Dolphins players before a game this month in London (Henry Browne/Getty Images)
NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell said Tuesday that team owners will discuss a plan when they meet next week for dealing with the raging national controversy over players’ protests during the national anthem, adding that while the league respects the right of its players to express their opinions, it believes they should stand during the playing of the anthem.
While stopping short of saying the NFL would require its players to stand, Goodell strongly suggested in a letter to NFL teams that at next week’s meeting the league would propose to owners that players be required to do so, while also providing a platform to recognize their community activism.
“Like many of our fans, we believe that everyone should stand for the national anthem,” Goodell wrote to NFL club presidents and chief executives. “It is an important moment in our game. We want to honor our flag and our country, and our fans expect that of us. We also care deeply about our players and respect their opinions and concerns about critical social issues. The controversy over the anthem is a barrier to having honest conversations and making real progress on the underlying issues. We need to move past this controversy, and we want to do that together with our players.”
Goodell said the league’s plan would include “an in-season platform to promote the work of players” on social issues, “and that will help to promote positive change in our country.”
Next week’s meeting in New York was previously scheduled, but the ongoing controversy over the national anthem forced the issue to the top of the agenda. “There is no fixed proposal. We will have a discussion around all of these issues,” said one person familiar with the league’s deliberations.
Goodell has had recent discussions with owners and player leaders over the anthem issue. One set of conversations has come with a group of players including Malcolm Jenkins, Anquan Boldin, Michael Bennett and Torrey Smith. Those players have asked for official league support of players’ community activism.
“I expect and look forward to a full and open discussion of these issues when we meet next week in New York,” Goodell wrote. “Everyone involved in the game needs to come together on a path forward to continue to be a force for good within our communities, protect the game, and preserve our relationship with fans throughout the country. The NFL is at its best when we ourselves are unified. In that spirit, let’s resolve that next week we will meet this challenge in a unified and positive way.”
Sarah Huckabee Sanders, the White House press secretary, was asked about Goodell’s letter at her daily briefing and said: “We would support the NFL coming out and asking players to stand, as the president has done … Our position hasn’t changed on that front. We’re glad to see NFL taking positive steps in that direction.”
The NFL Players Association did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Goodell’s memo.
Joe Lockhart, the NFL’s executive vice president of communications and public affairs, declined in a conference call with reporters Tuesday morning to give a direct answer when asked whether the league believes that a team, under current rules, is within its rights to compel its players to stand for the anthem.
Dallas Cowboys owner Jerry Jones said Sunday that any Cowboys player who protests during the anthem and, in Jones’s view, thereby shows disrespect to the American flag will be benched and will not play.
Miami Dolphins owner Stephen Ross also has said he expects his team’s players to stand for the anthem. The Dolphins enacted a policy this past weekend by their coach, Adam Gase, in which players must stand for the anthem if on the team’s sideline, but have the option to remain in the locker room or in the tunnel leading to the field for the anthem.
“We’re going to do this together as an ownership group and a league with the players,” Lockhart said Tuesday.
 Play Video 1:56
Fact Check: Can the NFL fire players for protesting?
The NFL can fire players, but it won't be easy. (Meg Kelly/The Washington Post)
Owners are scheduled to meet next Tuesday and Wednesday in Manhattan. It is their regular fall meeting and was scheduled before the anthem controversy was amplified by recent comments made by President Trump criticizing players for protesting during the national anthem.
“I think everyone at this point is frustrated by this situation,” Lockhart said, and added: “The commissioner and the owners do want the players to stand.”
The owners’ meeting will include “a discussion about the entire issue, including the [anthem] policy,” said Lockhart, who declined to make a prediction about the outcome of those deliberations.
Lockhart said “nothing has changed” regarding the league’s view of enforcing anthem-related guidelines in its game operations manual. That manual, distributed to teams by the league, says that players must be on the sideline for the anthem and should be standing. Failure to be on the sideline could result in discipline being imposed, the manual says. The league has not issued any discipline this season for such violations.
“It doesn’t say the players must stand,” Lockhart said. “It says the players should stand.”
Lockhart said he does not know whether DeMaurice Smith, the executive director of the NFLPA, and other union representatives were told by Goodell and New York Giants co-owner John Mara during a meeting last week that players would not face discipline for protests during the anthem, as Smith said Monday.
“Last week both the commissioner and the chair of the NFL Management Council John Mara were clear when they assured our union leaders, in the presence of other owners, that they would respect the Constitutional rights of our members without retribution,” Smith said in a written statement Monday.
Lockhart said he does not believe that any potential changes to the sport’s anthem policies would have to be collectively bargained with the players’ union.
Those guidelines are spelled out in the game operations manual, not the publicly available NFL rule book.
The NFL’s game operations manual says: “The national anthem must be played prior to every NFL game, and all players must be on the sideline for the national anthem.
“During the national anthem, players on the field and bench area should stand at attention, face the flag, hold helmets in their left hand, and refrain from talking. The home team should ensure that the American flag is in good condition. It should be pointed out to players and coaches that we continue to be judged by the public in this area of respect for the flag and our country. Failure to be on the field by the start of the national anthem may result in discipline, such as fines, suspensions, and/or the forfeiture of draft choice(s) for violations of the above, including first offenses.”
The Cowboys are on their bye week and do not play this weekend, so their next game will come after the owners’ meeting. The Dolphins play Sunday at Atlanta.
Three Dolphins players last weekend were not on the field for the anthem. Two Cowboys players raised their fists at the conclusion of the anthem Sunday night, but Jones said Sunday night he had not seen that.
Trump has been unyielding. He said he instructed Vice President Pence to leave Sunday’s Colts-49ers game in Indianapolis if players protested during the national anthem, and later praised Pence’s early exit. Trump suggested Tuesday on Twitter that what he described as “massive tax breaks” received by the NFL should be addressed.
“Why is the NFL getting massive tax breaks while at the same time disrespecting our Anthem, Flag and Country? Change tax law!” Trump wrote.
Lockhart pointed out that the NFL relinquished its tax-exempt status in 2015 and that individual teams were taxed even when the league had that status.
“Even when we had tax exempt status, it did not result in a tax break …. We do not receive any massive tax breaks, none at all,” Lockhart said.
Some owners seem wary of the business implications of the anthem controversy and the public feud with the White House. To this point, there has been no indication of any major sponsors dropping the NFL. The league has disputed a link between the protests and sagging TV ratings. But the NFL has acknowledged that it knows many fans are angry and sponsors are wary of the league engaging in a very heated and public political debate.
 Play Video 1:22
White House supports NFL commissioner’s position on national anthem
White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders said on Oct. 10 that the White House agrees with NFL Commissioner Rodger Goodell’s statement that players should stand during the national anthem. (Reuters)
David Nakamura contributed to this report.

Quiz #2 Review Sheet

Perspectives on Mass Communication (blog + class + text) 
Functions of the mass media:
surveillance;
interpretation;
linkage;
transmission of values;
entertainment
Categories of the uses and gratifications approach:
cognition;
diversion;
social utility (conversational currency; parasocial relationships);
withdrawal

Historical and Cultural Context (blog + class + text) 
Media time line (eight milestones in communication evolution—language, writing, printing, telegraph/telephone, photography/motion pictures, radio/TV, digital media/handheld devices
Importance of “writing” (alphabet, surface, social impact, etc.)
Printing (China, Germany)
Effects of the Gutenberg Revolution
Technological determinism
Significance of the telegraph to mass communication
Cultural impact of radio and TV
Digital media (mobile parenting, time softening)


Communication: Mass and Other Forms (blog + class + text) 
Elements in the communication process
            -source
            -encoding
            -message
            -channel
            -decoding
            -receiver
            -feedback
            -noise
The major mass media
Intrapersonal communication
Interpersonal communication
Small Group communication
Public communication
Mass communication
Common characteristics of traditional mass media outlets
            -complex and formal
            -multiple gatekeepers
            -need vast cash to operate
            -exist to make a profit
            -highly competitive

Future of mass media (segmentation, convergence, disintermediation)

Rules of Language (class) 
Phonemic rules (pronunciation; how many sounds are there in the English language?)
Semantic rules (what we mean when we say things)
Syntax rules (grammar)
Pragmatic rules (how we actually use language)
Normative rules (what is considered appropriate)
Triangle of Meaning

Articles
College students and the First Amendment
ESPN is Terrified of Jemele Hill's Honesty on Racism
Roger Goodell Says NFL Believes Players Should Stand During National Anthem 
Know the Top 5 DMAs 

Potential Crew

Please list your name and your skills following this model:


Erik McSwain - Editing, Cinematography
Rebeka Kashkin - editing, cinematography
Marissa Proulx- Editing, directing, filming
Taylor Fairweather - directing, cameras
Maxine Hansford- directing, acting
charlie winston- acting, directing, cameras, security
Sami Lemza - acting, directing,camera
Amanda Shelton: audio, editing
Taylor Hubbard:Editing, Camera, After effects
Katie Husselbee - Camera / cinematography, directing, lighting
Abby Hauptman-Directing, cinemtography, producing, editing
Jacqueline Agahigian-Directing,lightening, editing, cinematogpher
Dina Barossi- directing, producing, editing, cinemotography
Elinor Zollweg - editing, camera op
Florent Amiel- acting, audio, post production, anything to help :)
Andrew Bain - audio, editing
Samantha Schmalz- editing, camera/cinematography, writer
Jamie Osman- Editing, Camera, Producing, filming
Mackenzie Dixon - producing, editing
Shannon Moran- Lighting, Filming, Acting
Pallas-Amenah Morgan- DP, Editor, Script Supervisor, Director
kat snyder- camera, editing, producing
Rachel Connor - anything but lighting
Emily Horne- camera, producing, filming, acting,
Ben Carlton - not lighting
Benjamin Koch - camera/filming, editing
Emma Fruhling- camera, audio, producing, directing, acting
Alyssa Denger-Camera, audio, lighting, producing
Alys Derby - Camera Op, Audio, Lighting, Producing, Editing, Acting
Aidan DeBolt- Audio, camera
Ryan Maloney - Camera, Editing
Daniel Coye - acting, gaffing, directing
Max Prestwich - Camera Op, Acting
Lexi Leitner- Acting, lighting, directing, production assistant
Val DiGloria- acting, producing, directing, really anything non-technical
Matthew Price- Acting, Camera Operator, Directing

Monday, October 9, 2017

M 11 a.m. student media projects

Group 1
1. Cooper Hayes
2. Jonathon Iris
3. Max Prestwich
4. Troy Verderame

Group 2
1. Sam Butlien
2. Trina
3. Gabi Lacen
4. Marissa Proulx

Group 3
1.
2.
3.
4.

Group 4
1.
2.
3.
4.

Group 5
1.
2.
3.
4.

Group 6
1.
2.
3.
4.

Group 7
1.
2.
3.
4.

Group 8
1.
2.
3.
4.





M Student Media Projects 10 a.m.

Group 1

1. Dina Barossi
2. Lexi Leitner
3. Alex Eischen
4. Derby Allman

Group 2

1. Jacqueline Agahigian
2. Mara Batt
3. Shannon Moran
4. Ruby Kravitz

Group 3

1. Amie Barrett-Beckers
2. Maxine Hansford
3. Samantha Schmalz
4. Rebeka Kashkin

Group 4

1. Andrew Cabrera
2. Joshua Aracena
3. Dan Albanese
4. Reice Shipley

Group 5

1. Aaron Segal
2. Aidan DeBolt
3. Elijah Joseph
4. Josie Lumbard

Group 6

1. John Peterson
2. Sammy Meminger
3. Emma Fruhling
4. Dylan Campbell

Group 7

1.
2.
3.
4.

Group 8

1.
2.
3.
4.

M Labs Coca-Cola Regal Film Teams

Emily Horne and Kat Snyder
Sam Butlien and Lizzy Ring
Jared Joslin and Andrew Cabrera
Marissa Proulx and Max Hansford
Victoria Ammirato and Sam Rachmuth
Pallas-Amenah Morgan and Alanna Porto
Samantha Schmalz and Ruby Kravitz
Rebeka Kashkin and Amie Barrett-Beckers
Dan Albanese, Josh Aracena, and Reice Shipley
Elijah Joseph and Aaron Segal
Shannon Moran and Josie Lumbard
George Murray and Seamus Mulhern
Troy Verderame and Max Prestwich
Michael Walker and Nick Ricci
Gabi Lacen and Trina McGhee



Saturday, October 7, 2017

Message from Coca-Cola Regal Film Contest:

Filmmakers,

Thank you for participating in one of our many webinars. As we've presented the program I've noticed that a lot of students didn't have access to the program materials. All program materials can be found here. 
  • PLEASE read the program rules and program brief before submitting. There are parameters for what we are looking for.
  • This is not a coke commercial and we've received a lot of applications that read like a product commercial. The program brief explains what type of branded content we are looking for. 
  • The budget template is in that folder. YOU MUST have the legal lines at the bottom of the last page signed by each applicant and the professor. 
We are hosting new webinars next week. The point of these calls will be to share your ideas and get feedback or listen in and ask questions. All are welcome to join. Please note that these are scheduled for central time. 

We hope to see you on the webinar next week and can't wait to read your ideas. 

Wednesday, October 4, 2017

W Lab Mass Media Projects



Group 1
1. Elinor Zollweg
2. Sami Lemza
3. TJ Hubbard
4. AJ Gildin

Group 2
1. Katie Husselbee
2. Lexie Thomas
3. Abby Hauptman
4. Kenzie Dixon

Group 3
1. Eva Kirie
2. Quinn Theobald
3. Matthew Price
4. Stephen Rothhaar

Group 4
1. Nicole Villalobos
2. Victoria Ammirato
3. Noah Lindsay
4. Clara Montague

Group 5
1. Aviva Nachman
2. Alyssa Denger
3. Andrew Bain
4.

Group 6
1. Charlie Winston
2. Grace Littell
3. Chaim Goodman
4. Indy Varma

Group 7
1.
2.
3.
4.


W Lab 11 a.m.

Please follow this format:

Jack Powers and Elisabeth Shue
Peas and Carrots

Eva Kirie and Clara Montague
Matthew Price and Lexi Leitner
Victoria Ammirato and Sam Rachmuth
Andrew Bain and Aviva Nachman
Noah Lindsay and Derby Allman
Elinor Zollweg and Sami Lemza
Grace Littell and Nicole Villalobos
Charlie Winston and Chaim Goodman
Alyssa Denger and Emma Fruhling
Lexie Thomas, Katie Husselbee and Abby Hauptman
AJ Gildin and Taylor Hubbard
Mackenzie Dixon and Indy Varma
Stephen Rothhaar

W Lab 10:00 a.m. Mass Media Group Projects

Group 1
1. Ben Carlton
2. Ian Quinn
3. Kat Snyder
4.


Group 2
1. Preston Jones
2. Ben Koch
3. Brittany Buzzutto
4. Julianne Grillo



Group 3
1. Amanda Shelton
2. Hannah Reed
3. Jenna Schmid
4. Nick White



Group 4
1. Stephen Shea
2. Samantha Marks
3.
4.



Group 5
1. Jorge Casado
2. Daniel Coye
3. Ryan Maloney
4.



Group 6
1. Faith Personale
2. Rebecca Hetzel
3. Taylor Fairweather
4. Juliet Noble



Group 7
1. Abigail Caswell
2. Liza Gillespie
3. Natalie Newman
4. Jamie Osman 



Group 8
1.
2.
3.
4.






W Lab 10 a.m. Groups for Coca-Cola/Regal Assignment

Please follow this format:

Jack Powers and Natalie Portman
Kermit the Frog and Miss Piggy



Liza Gillespie and Jenny Clawson

Rebecca Hetzel and Faith Personale
Ben Carlton and Ian Quinn
Ryan Maloney and Aidan DeBolt
Taylor Fairweather and Nick White
Stephen Shea and Samantha Marks
Kat SNyder and Emily Horne
Brittany Buzzutto and Jules Grillo
Preston Jones and Ben Koch
Abigail Caswell and jamie Osman
Natalie Newman and Cameron Coughlin
Jorge Casado and Dan Coye
Hannah Reed and Jenna Schmid
Juliet Noble and Jon Iris
Amanda Shelton and Flo Amiel


Tuesday, October 3, 2017

Everything you need for the Coca-Cola/Regal Cinemas Assignment:

https://drive.google.com/open?id=0BwDgZfdYAi68SEVIMl9mTEVZX2M

Reaction #3 Prompt

For your 3rd reaction piece, please read the Washington Post article posted on the blog (https://tvr124fall2017.blogspot.com/2017/10/college-students-and-first-amendment.html) and write a 250-500-word reaction to the article. You may want to consider the following prompts (but you don't have to): 

Should colleges and universities ban controversial speakers from campus? Why or why not? 

Should hate speech be constitutionally protected? Why or why not? 

This last one is from the article: Let’s say a public university hosts a “very controversial speaker,” one “known for making offensive and hurtful statements.” Would it be acceptable for a student group to disrupt the speech “by loudly and repeatedly shouting so that the audience cannot hear the speaker”? Why or why not? 

The assignment is due Sunday, October 8th, 2017 by midnight PDT.

Please post your Reaction to Sakai, under Tests & Quizzes.


Monday, October 2, 2017

Get the Gold App Inventor Tutorial

Get the Gold for App Inventor 2

What You're Building

By building the Get The Gold App you will get practice with setting visibility, using Clock components and Timers, and detecting collisions in App Inventor. You'll program an application that has a pirate ship whose goal is to collect all the gold on the screen.

Getting Started

Connect to the App Inventor web site and start a new project. Name it GetTheGold, and also set the screen's Title to "GetTheGold". Switch to the Blocks view and connect to a device or emulator.

Introduction

This tutorial introduces the following skills, useful for future game development:
  • Using the Clock component
  • Using Clock.Timer to move sprites
  • Using Sprite.Flung to move a sprite
  • Using collision detection

Getting Ready

For this game, you will have two types of imagesprites: pirate and gold coin. Click below to download the image file for your sprites.

Set up the Components

Use the component designer to create the interface for GetTheGold. When you finish, it should look something like the snapshot below (more detailed instructions below the snapshot).
To create this interface, put the following components into the Designer by dragging them from the Component Palette into the Viewer.
Component TypePalette GroupWhat you'll name itPurpose of Component
CanvasDrawing and AnimationCanvas1The background that we will be putting our imagesprites on
ImageSpriteDrawing and AnimationPirateSpriteThe pirate ship in our game
ImageSpriteDrawing and AnimationImageSprite2One of the gold coins in the game
ImageSpriteDrawing and AnimationImageSprite3One of the gold coins in the game
ImageSpriteDrawing and AnimationImageSprite4One of the gold coins in the game
ImageSpriteDrawing and AnimationImageSprite5One of the gold coins in the game
ImageSpriteDrawing and AnimationImageSprite6One of the gold coins in the game
ClockUser InterfaceClock1We use the Clock for its Timer method to move the coins
ButtonUser InterfaceResetButtonTo reset the game so the player can play again
Set the properties of the components as described below:
ComponentAction
ResetButtonChange Text property to "Reset".
PirateSpriteChange Speed property to 6.Upload the pirateship image and set Picture property to pirateship.
ImageSprite(2,3,4,5,6)Upload the goldcoin image and set Picture property to goldcoin.
ClockChange TimerInterval property to 2000.

Moving the Pirate

To move the PirateSprite, we want the user to be able to "fling" the sprite in the direction that they choose. To do this, we will use the PirateSprite.Flung event handler.
You may notice that PirateSprite.Flung takes in 6 attributes: x, y, xvel, yvel, speed, and heading. We want to reassign PirateSprite's current heading to the heading given to us from PirateSprite.Flung. This means that the user can now control the direction of the pirate ship with their fingers by flinging on the screen.
To prevent the pirate from moving off the screen, we will also use PirateSprite.Bounce when an edge is reached.

Moving the Coins

We want the coins to move to random positions on the screen. We will use Clock1.Timer and the ImageSprite's MoveTo method to do this.
When the Clock1.Timer goes off, we want all of our gold coin ImageSprites to move to a new random location on the Canvas. We will do this by using the Sprite.MoveTo block.
MoveTo takes in two arguments: the x and y coordinates on the canvas of the new position we want the sprite to move to. We want the Sprite to move to a new random location so we will use the random integer block found in the Math box. Since we want each Gold ImageSprite to move to a new location, we repeat this process for each sprite's MoveTo function.
For ImageSprite2, we want x to be a random integer from 0 to Canvas1.Width-ImageSprite2.Width and y to be a random integer from 0 to Canvas1.Height-ImageSprite2.Height. This is to be repeated for all the Gold Image Sprites.
Remember that sprites are measured at the upper left corner as (0,0) so if we don't want them to go off the screen, we need to take the sprite's height/width into account when setting the range for our random numbers.
We will do this by setting up our blocks as in the image below:

Detecting Collisions

App Inventor detects collisions by checking for an intersection between the bounding rectangles of each ImageSprite. We call this rectangle-based collision detection. As you can see in the image below, sprites with circular or polygon shape will appear to collide because of the rectangular bounds around them when they might not actually be colliding.
We can use the PirateSprite.CollidedWith event handler to detect whenever the pirate ship collides with another sprite or gold coin. You may notice that PirateSprite.CollidedWith takes in an argument. This argument is the object that PirateSprite just collided with. We will be testing inside the handler for which object so the name of this argument is not significant. You can name it other.
Whenever the pirate collides with a gold coin, we want the coin to disappear. We can do this by setting the coin's visibility to false. To find which coin the pirate collided with, we will use the PirateSprite.CollidingWith.
We can use PirateSprite.CollidingWith to take in a component (each of the gold coin sprites) to detect which sprite was hit. This is a component block and NOT a text block with the words ImageSprite inside. The component block can be found in the drawer for each component. If a sprite was hit, we will set its visibility to false.

Reset Button

After the user hits all of the gold sprites with the pirate ship, none of them will be visible. The reset button should set all of the gold sprites' visibility to true.

Complete Program

Here's the complete GetTheGold program.
Package the final version of the app by choosing Package For Phone | Barcode from the Component Designer menu. When the barcode appears, use the barcode scanner on your phone to download and install the app.

Variations

Once you get this program running, you may want to do the following additional features to extend it. For example,
  • Create a label to display the time that it took you to get all the gold
  • Change the speed of the ship or gold coins
  • Add an enemy sprite that when collided with, causes your pirate to lose speed
  • Use one of the phone's sensors to control movement of the pirate ship


Sunday, October 1, 2017

College Students and the First Amendment (from The Washington Post):

A chilling study shows how hostile college students are toward free speech



Demonstrators march during a free speech rally in Berkeley, Calif. (Josh Edelson/AP)

 Opinion writer  



Here’s the problem with suggesting that upsetting speech warrants “safe spaces,” or otherwise conflating mere words with physical assault: If speech is violence, then violence becomes a justifiable response to speech.
Just ask college students. A fifth of undergrads now say it’s acceptable to use physical force to silence a speaker who makes “offensive and hurtful statements.”
That’s one finding from a disturbing new survey of students conducted by John Villasenor, a Brookings Institution senior fellow and University of California at Los Angeles professor.
In August, motivated by concerns about the “narrowing window of permissible topics” for discussion on campuses, Villasenor conducted a nationwide survey of 1,500 undergraduate students at four-year colleges. Financial support for the survey was provided by the Charles Koch Foundation, which Villasenor said had no involvement in designing, administering or analyzing the questionnaire; as of this writing, the foundation had also not seen his results.
Many of Villasenor’s questions were designed to gauge students’ understanding of the First Amendment. Colleges, after all, pay a lot of lip service to “freedom of speech,” despite high-profile examples of civil-liberty-squelching on campus. The survey suggests that this might not be due to hypocrisy so much as a misunderstanding of what the First Amendment actually entails.
For example, when students were asked whether the First Amendment protects “hate speech,” 4 in 10 said no. This is, of course, incorrect. Speech promoting hatred — or at least, speech perceived as promoting hatred — may be abhorrent, but it is nonetheless constitutionally protected.

Results based on online survey of 1,500 undergraduate students at U.S. four-year colleges and universities, all U.S. citizens, conducted Aug. 17-31. For a confidence level of 95 percent, the margin of error is between approximately 2 percent and 6 percent, depending on the group.
There were no statistically significant differences in response to this question based on political affiliation. But there were significant differences by gender: Women are more likely than men to believe hate speech is not constitutionally protected (49 percent vs. 38 percent, respectively).
Students were asked whether the First Amendment requires that an offensive speaker at a public university be matched with one with an opposing view. Here, 6 in 10 (mistakenly) said that, yes, the First Amendment requires balance.
The most chilling findings, however, involved how students think repugnant speech should be dealt with.  
Villasenor offered a hypothetical that may sound familiar to those who recall recent fracases at California State University at Los Angeles, Middlebury College, Claremont McKenna College and other institutions:
Let’s say a public university hosts a “very controversial speaker,” one “known for making offensive and hurtful statements.” Would it be acceptable for a student group to disrupt the speech “by loudly and repeatedly shouting so that the audience cannot hear the speaker”?

Results based on online survey of 1,500 undergraduate students at U.S. four-year colleges and universities, all U.S. citizens, conducted Aug. 17-31. For a confidence level of 95 percent, the margin of error is between approximately 2 percent and 6 percent, depending on the group.
Astonishingly, half said that snuffing out upsetting speech — rather than, presumably, rebutting or even ignoring it — would be appropriate. Democrats were more likely than Republicans to find this response acceptable (62 percent to 39 percent), and men were more likely than women (57 percent to 47 percent). Even so, sizable shares of all groups agreed.
It gets even worse.
Respondents were also asked if it would be acceptable for a student group to use violence to prevent that same controversial speaker from talking. Here, 19 percent said yes.

Results based on online survey of 1,500 undergraduate students at U.S. four-year colleges and universities, all U.S. citizens, conducted Aug. 17-31. For a confidence level of 95 percent, the margin of error is between approximately 2 percent and 6 percent, depending on the group.
There were no statistically significant differences in response by political party affiliation. Men, however, were three times as likely as women to endorse using physical force to silence controversial views (30 percent of men vs. 10 percent of women).
None of this bodes well for the alt-right’s Berkeley Free Speech Week events next week.
Judging from the lineup — which includes professional troll Milo Yiannopoulos and Pizzagate conspiracy theorist Mike Cernovich — the apparent goal of this event is not to help students face hard truths or grapple with thoughtful conservative viewpoints. It’s to say disgusting things in an attempt to provoke liberals into doing something stupid, surrendering any claim to moral high ground. If that happens, President Trump’s “both sides” comments will ring a little truer, while liberals and colleges are further cemented as whataboutist bogeymen for the right.
In truth, lefties can do more to call out threats to civil liberties perpetrated by their ideological allies. And colleges can do more to promote freer debate. But many of Villasenor’s results — like those from other data sources — show that the right is also astonishingly open to shutting down speech.
What’s more, colleges alone are not to blame for these findings. Other data suggest that freshmen are arriving on campus with more intolerant attitudes toward free speech than their predecessors did, and that Americans of all ages have become strikingly hostile toward basic civil and political liberties.
Colleges provide a crucible for America’s increasingly strained attitudes toward free discourse. But they are just the canaries in the coal mine. 

Coca-Cola- Regal Cinemas Application Link

Link to Webinar presentation regarding specifics of contest assignment:

https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/17asJmam4PCuwxH2xOGtyKhpqWnk0_H1s2upwt-wtpPw/edit#slide=id.g2413f6a2d2_2_5


Link to the application: 

http://bit.ly/CCRF2018App

Due date: Friday, October 13th by midnight, PDT.

You will be not be evaluated on content, but you will be evaluated on whether you gave the assignment thoughtful consideration.

Incomplete or hastily put together applications will not receive full credit.

If you take it seriously and put some thought behind it, you'll get full credit.

This should be a fun assignment.

Jack






A list of prominent shows/production companies run by POC

Recognizing that the lack of diversity continues to be a problem in the entertainment media industry, it's important to be aware of thos...