Thursday, November 9, 2017

Sound Recording and Radio (Overview):

Sound recordings (mainly music)

HISTORY

. Thomas Edison invents phonograph in 1877 (records on metal cylinder format); earliest
uses thought to be for dictation and other business needs

. Emile Berliner patents gramophone; makes spiral track recordings on flat disc

. nickelodeons: 1890s amusement arcade device that plays back a two-minute recording
for five cents; immensely popular. Demand for “entertainment cylinders” grows

Rivalry

Berliner premiers the Victrola in 1906, the first disc player designed to look like the furniture. He forms the Victor Talking Machine Company (the trademark is the famous picture of a dog peering into the bell of a gramophone with the logo, “His Master’s Voice”). The superiority of his device essentially ends the intense business rivalry going on in the recording industry between him, Edison, and the Columbia Phonograph Company.

Early popular recorded music included sentimental favorites, ragtime, jazz, and film musicals. By 1914 record players and record collections become a household standard, encouraged by a national dance craze that lasts through the World War I years. The boom continued into the 1920s with the dawn of the Jazz Age, the blues and jazz music foundation for the Roaring Twenties era.

The Impact of Radio on the Recording Industry

By 1924 record player sales drop 50 percent from 1923, largely due to the popularity of live music delivered via the new radio medium. Record companies counter in 1926 by introducing electronic recording which much improved sound quality, and the marketing of radio-phonograph combination devices. Audiences soon identify radio as the home of “live” music compared to the “canned” music of records. RCA and Victor merge in 1929 to dominate the radio and recording industry.

The Great Depression

With a hard economy imposing record low profits on the industry, a new coin-operated music device called the juke box helps rescue the industry during the Depression years. Installed in bars, diners, and drugstores, juke boxes help boost record sales nearly 500 percent by 1939.

World War II and After

Shellac, a vital manufacturing ingredient for records, is declared a vital defense commodity by the government during the war, and record making plummets. Adding to industry woes is the American Federation of Musicians' strike, 1942-44, who fear losing jobs from canned music. Capitol records, however, begins novel idea of sending free records to radio stations to promote certain songs; it becomes a practice that soon revolutionizes both mediums.

In 1947 the 3M Company introduces magnetic recording tape (an idea borrowed from wartime Germany) which provides better sound quality, easier editing, reduced costs, and multitrack recording capabilities. In 1948 Columbia Records introduces the 33 1/3 long-playing record (the LP). RCA enters the fray with its 45 rpm record, and the marketing battles of this era soon became known as the "Battle of the Speeds." Soon the 33 1/3 becomes the preferred format for albums, and the 45 remains the choice for single hits; the older 78 rpm format quietly disappears. In the 1950s stereophonic players debut, which quickly double the number of records being sold.

Other events that also help heighten record sales:

. emergence of small independent labels (made possible by lowered manufacturing costs)

. emergence of radio as a promotion device (the "promotion" department now a permanent
fixture in every recording company office )

. the nearly unbreakable new records enabled them to be sent through the mail, thus making
possible the birth of record clubs

. as an emerging TV medium strips radio of its standard formats in the early 1950s, radio
looks to new ways to attract audiences; playing the Top 40 songs becomes one of the most
popular ideas.

The Coming of Rock and Roll

As teenagers in the 1950s began to create their own identifiable, American sub-culture (unique clothes, customized cars, and hair styles), they lack their own brand of music. Rock and roll, with its roots in rhythm and blues, commercial white popular music, country and western, and jazz, quickly fill the void.  Rock and roll owed much of its explosive popularity to new singers such as Elvis Presley, Bill Haley, Buddy Holly, Little Richard, Jerry Lee Lewis, and Chuck Berry, all of whom brought to rock and roll their own unique styles that helps give even more richness to the emerging music genre.

Rock Goes Commercial

For various reasons (some scandalous, some not), all the original rock stars had left the scene by 1959. The radio-recording payola scandals of the period further blemishes an already suspect image of rock and roll. In the early 1960s the industry counters by cleaning up rock's image with a new wave of wholesome, clean-cut American singers: Ricky Nelson, Bobby Vinton, Paul Anka, Connie Francis, Fabian, the Four Seasons, Annette Funicello, and Brenda Lee to name a few.

The British Invasion

In 1964 the Beatles took rock and roll by storm with a sound that was widely recognized as upbeat and innovative. Many other British groups followed, but not all followed the same music style; the Rolling Stones and the Animals, for example, exemplified a new blues-based, harsher, and slightly more aggressive sound. Both styles merged somewhat with two music genres currently coming of age in the United States: folk (with artists such as Bob Dylan, Joan Baez, and Peter, Paul, and Mary) and the Motown sound (with artists such as Diana Ross and the Supremes, and the Jackson Five).

Transitions

Music genres in the late 1960s reflect the social experimentation and cultural transition of the times. Freedom, experimentation, and innovation are in. The group Blood, Sweat, and Tears blend jazz, rock and classical music. The Who record a rock opera, Tommy. By the 1970s rock music becomes synonymous with the counter culture, giving rise to non-mainstream groups who play the brash new heavy metal sounds. Countering heavy metal, a softer rock sound emerges, and a few years later a crossover movement sees both genres merging somewhat with a country western music sound. Often the same top songs are featured on the charts of both rock and country music charts.

Industry Trends 1970-1990s

Profits in the record industry followed several roller coaster trends since the 70s, some of which were due to trends (disco), high profile artists (Michael Jackson), new technologies (CDs), the 80s promotional vehicles of music videos and MTV, and the main stream debut of rap music in the 90s.


More Diversity

The availability of digital music on the Internet direct to the consumer is yet another example of the trend toward disintermediation.

DEFINING FEATURES OF SOUND RECORDING

• Sound recording is a cultural force, characterizing social groups, defining movements, and setting trends in society and, in turn, helps to shape modern culture.

• Second, sound recording is an international enterprise (five record companies dominate the global market, each company headquartered in a different country).

• Third, the recording business is a unique blend of business and talent.


ORGANIZATION OF THE RECORD INDUSTRY

The recording industry can be divided into four major segments:

. talent
. distribution
. production
. retail

Talent

The talent segment of the industry consists of all the singers, musicians, songwriters, arrangers, and lyricists who hope to make money by recording and selling songs, but the road to success is hard and long. Few make it big. A group's first step is usually to perform for local clubs and events; next, if they survive, they'll take their act on the road to gain experience, money, and a little recognition. Traveling acts play in bars and clubs where the band is little more than a human jukebox providing accompaniment or background music. If the talent is lucky, they might be noticed by an A&R (artist and repertoire) scout from a record label. If so, they might be invited to sign a contract.

Production

At a recording studio the group records an album or a few singles. Audio engineers use elaborate sound-mixing systems to perfect the right sound. When the label releases the group's single or album, promotion, publicity, advertising, merchandising, and packaging expertise start in. Though there are dozens of record labels, five firms dominate the industry: Sony, AOL-Time Warner, Bertelsmann, Universal, and EMI.

Distribution There are five main outlets for music distributors:

. direct retail stores (most of which have gone out of business in the past five years)
. rack jobbers they serve department stores and major discount chains (WalMart, Target, etc.)
. one-stops buy CDs from industry, then resell to CD stores and juke box firms
. direct consumer sales (a.k.a. packagers) sales from TV promotions and record clubs
. online sales the consumer deals directly with an online retailer (iTunes, amazon.com, etc.)


Retail

There are two major trends in the retail music segment: consolidation and online selling. Big music chain stores used to dominate, such as Sam Goody, Media Play, Camelot, but brick-and-mortar retailers faced increasing competition from online retailers such as Amazon.com and iTunes (and the general transition to digital music) and most have closed their doors.

WalMart has done well with its music sales (CDs and its online downloads). Today, most music sold comes from either iTunes (digital) or WalMart (CDs).


OWNERSHIP IN THE RECODING INDUSTRY

The recording industry is one of the most concentrated of all media industries, with just FOUR companies accounting for more than 87 percent of all sales. In addition, these companies are multinational conglomerates with interests in many different industries.

Here's a list-- courtesy of the AP-- of the top recording companies and a sampling of the artists they represent:

Here's a look at the top record labels, their artists and their U.S. market share as of Oct. 9:
_
UNIVERSAL MUSIC GROUP: 43.47% percent market share in U.S.
Labels include: Geffen Records, Island Def Jam Music Group, Motown Records, Verve Music Group, Decca Music Group.
Artists include: Gwen Stefani, Elton John, Jimi Hendrix, Kanye West, Shania Twain.
Universal Music Group also owns:
_ EMI GROUP PLC:
Labels include: Capitol Records, Virgin, Blue Note.
Artists include: Coldplay, Katy Perry, The Rolling Stones, Lenny Kravitz.

_ SONY MUSIC ENTERTAINMENT INC.: 22.79 percent market share.
Labels include: Arista Records, Columbia Records, Jive Records, RCA Records.
Artists include: Carrie Underwood, Alicia Keys, Usher, Chris Brown, AC/DC, Leona Lewis.

_ WARNER MUSIC GROUP CORP.: 21.12 percent market share.
Labels include: Atlantic Records, Warner Bros. Records.
Artists include Madonna, R.E.M., Green Day, Eric Clapton.

_ ALL OTHERS: 12.61 percent.
Source: Nielsen SoundScan, company Web sites.




PRODUCING RECORDS

Departments and Staff

There are seven departments within the typical recording company:

. artists and repertoire (A&R) at times industry talent scouts; also administrative duties. YouTube and Vimeo have effectively eliminated A&R departments. While they still exist, their numbers and duties have changed drastically. Today, most artists are 'discovered' online.
. sales and distribution sells products, makes sure inventory gets to targeted markets
. advertising and merchandising aids sales by planning media ad campaigns
. business lawyers, accountants, researchers, financial analysts, secretarial staff
. promotion get releases played on radio stations
. publicity tries to get press coverage and reviews for new performers in trade press
. artist development helps further artist’s career with tours, concerts, and TV appearances



FEEDBACK

Feedback in the record industry is measured by Billboard magazine’s weekly ratings of stars, triangles, and bullets. Stars are “mover” titles, bullets go to one million seller singles, and triangles to the two million single sellers. In general, the Billboard’s “Hot-100 Chart is based on two components: exposure and sales.

For sales figures, Billboard measures the top 50 retail sales markets, subjectively choosing the most influential music outlets; about 185 outlets are surveyed weekly.

To measure exposure, Billboard surveys the play lists of about 240 leading radio stations, all of which are weighted by audience reach (bigger audiences count more than smaller markets). As evidence of their symbiotic relationship, radio stations usually monitor Billboard magazine to see which records they ought to be playing. The magazine then combines the two components to forge a final figure, which is reported as that song’s rating. Billboard publishes a chart for almost all popular music formats.   Although sampling numbers may vary, the underlying process remains the same.

Sound-Recording Audiences

Demographic profiles for record audiences are difficult to come by because the recording industry is supported by audience purchases and not by advertising. This means that recording companies concentrate on overall sales figures rather than seeking detailed demographic information about their audiences. What information that does exist centers mainly on estimates of the number and type of playback equipment, CDs, files, etc. in the average household. In terms of music sales, people over 35 now account for more than 60 percent of sales (a 30 percent increase over the past 20 years ), while spending by those 19 and under has decreased from 35 to 15 percent during the same period (which gives us an indication as to how popular file-sharing is among teens).


------

Radio

HISTORY

Early Radio Milestones

1873:  James Maxwell of Scotland suggests an electromagnetic signal could be sent through
space without using wires

1887:  Heinrich Hertz, of Germany, verifies Maxwell's theory in a series of experiments by
sending and detecting radio waves

1896:  Guglielmo Marconi sends wireless signal two miles in Morse Code (letters encoded by
a system of dots and dashes); sees promise of "wireless" (radio's first name) as a
ship-to-shore or ship communication medium; starts wireless telegraph company

1906: Reginald Fessenden, with the help of G.E., makes first high-speed continuous-wave
generator that can broadcast the human voice and music; makes first "broadcast" of
music to ships in New York Harbor on Christmas Eve

1908:  American Lee de Forest, inventor of vacuum tube which made it much easier to receive
audio waves, broadcasts a classical phonograph concert from the Eiffel Tower

Patent wars between inventors severely hampers early radio’s development; but when the US Navy assumes responsibility for all relevant patents at the outbreak of World War I, the log jam is broken and great technical strides take place.

The Evolution of Radio as a Mass Medium

Big Business

While radio development before World War I had been characterized by individual inventions, during the postwar years it would be characterized by corporate maneuvers.  In 1919 the Marconi Company sells its radio rights to General Electric (GE) who, in turn, created the Radio Corporation of America (RCA) to house the new division.  Stock would be jointly held by GE, the American Telephone and Telegraph Company (AT&T), and Westinghouse Electric.  David Sarnoff, an RCA  mid-manager but soon-to-be president of RCA, suggests radio would be a household appliance.

Mass Audience

Shortly before 1920 Frank Conrad, a Westinghouse engineer, begins broadcasting a potpourri of sports scores and music from his garage.  A local department store promotes the broadcasts by offering $10 discounts on their ready-built wireless sets.  Westinghouse sees opportunity and initiates the first radio station, KDKA of Pittsburgh, on November 20, 1920.  RCA begins broadcasting in 1921 and GE in 1922.  By 1926 there are over two million sets in operation and climbing rapidly.  By discovering that an audience existed for broadcast programs intended for the general public, radio had found the role it was to play for the foreseeable future.

Better Receivers

Early radios were bulky, filled with tubes and batteries, and required lots of patience from users in order to find—and keep—the desired radio signal for which they were looking.  In 1925 Gimbel's Department Store displays a bulky radio set in their window ($99, a huge sum in the 20s); that same day they sell 5,300 sets.  Radio receivers quickly evolve from a bulky, battery-dependent, one-listener hobby kit into a major piece of fashionable furniture running on household current that everyone could listen to at once.  Living room family radio had arrived.  Between 1925-1930, some 17 million sets are sold at an average price of $80.

Radio Goes Commercial

Station operating and equipment costs rose steadily along with personnel expenses.  Radio needed a steady revenue source to meet expenses.  AT&T's radio station begins charging a "toll" to anyone who wished to broadcast a message, and the most logical customers for that service were businesses who had services or products to sell.  Almost overnight, advertising becomes the new answer to how stations would make money.

Networks

The fifth element of radio's evolution came about when stations saw they could drastically cut their production costs by sharing program content; this inter-station agreement came to be known as a network.  Additionally, if enough stations were networked, an advertiser could reach a much larger audience yet deal with only one network broker.  The first network was the National Broadcasting Company (NBC) who went on the air in 1926; actually, NBC opened with two separate networks, one made up of solely owned RCA stations, and another made up of stations originally owned by AT&T.

By 1937 NBC had 111 affiliates and CBS had 105.  It wasn’t long before advertisers were spending more than $27 million annually on network advertising.

Government Regulation

As more radio stations came online in the 1920s, interference became a major problem.  In response, Congress passes the Radio Act of 1927 and creates the Federal Radio Commission to curtail practices that were causing massive interference problems by using non-authorized frequencies and power levels.  The FRC defines the AM band, standardizes channel designations, and abolishes portable stations.  Thus by the end of the 1920s the framework for modern radio was in place.  It would be a commercially supported medium dominated by networks and regulated by an agency of the federal government.

The Depression 1930-1940

Unlike other industries, radio fared fairly well in the Depression years.  Radio revenues tripled and  radio’s audience did the same (by 1940, radio was in 81 percent of US homes).  But there were also other significant evolutionary events for radio during this period.

            .  Federal Communications Commission (FCC) formed in 1934. President Roosevelt creates a new agency in charge of regulating all types of electronic communications; this seven-
member, appointed-for-life commission remains intact today and generally follows its original mandate

Birth of FM

In the mid-1930s Edwin Howard Armstrong, a noted inventor, demonstrated frequency modulated radio, or FM.  Despite FM's obvious superior quality over AM radio, Armstrong's audience, RCA, is not interested, opting instead to concentrate on developing TV as an emerging technology.  Though a few companies buy licenses from Armstrong to develop sets, WW II curtails FM's development.

Radio Programs

The gloom of the Depression years meant more people turned to radio for free entertainment, thus popular radio programs of this era reflected a need for diversion and escape.  Dramatic programs, such as The Lone Ranger, Gangbusters, The Shadow, Dick Tracy, and Buck Rogers flourished. Then radio created an entirely new dramatic genre, the soap opera; by 1940 there were some 40 different soaps on the air such as Helen Trent, Our Gal Sunday, Backstage Wife, and Clara, Lu 'n' Em.

The 1930s saw network news grow into a serious and highly respected field.  News commentator Edward R. Murrow with CBS news quickly becomes one of America's most respected news personalities (another first for radio).  President Franklin Roosevelt also finds a new and controversial role for radio, political speeches, with his famous Depression era "Fireside chats."

World War II

Radio thrives during WW II era.  Ad revenues double from 1940-1945, outpacing newspapers as the top national advertising vehicle in 1943.  In that same year, the Supreme Court forever alters the broadcast landscape by forcing NBC to divest itself of one of its two networks.  The new network that emerges, ABC, ends the war years with 195 affiliates, making it a full-fledged competitor with NBC and CBS.

Innovation and Change: 1945-1954

In the nine years following WW II, the growth of television forced radio to abandon its role as a dramatic entertainer and switch instead to a reliance on playing pre-recorded music.  The public’s focus on television as the nation’s new entertainment medium also helped delay the widespread acceptance of FM radio.

FM

Although FM sounded better than AM, was static free, and could reproduce a wider range of sound frequencies, a number of pieces of bad fortune hampered FM’s quick development.  Initially, of course, World War II froze FM development, but later these problems added to FM’s woes:

.            FM was trying to develop simultaneously with television’s evolution

.            FM and TV shared nearly the same electromagnetic wave area; in 1945 the FCC gave TV FM’s former bandwidths, moving FM into the 88-108-MHz band where it remains today.

Television

The emergence of TV meant changes in the contents, economics, and functions of radio.  Although TV did not have a negative effect on individual station revenues, it did drastically affect network radio.  Network affiliations were nearly cut in half; but despite a brief drop in revenues, radio profits continued to steadily increase.  To do that, radio stations turned less to network-based advertising and more to local advertisers for support.  Local stations created new formats (music, talk and news) to help fill the now vacated network program airtime.

Specialized Formats

More than anything these changes allowed local radio to adopt specialized formats, sounds that had distinctive appeal to a certain segment of the audience.  One highly successful format, the Top-40, soon became indistinguishable from any other Top-40 station—until, that is, the advent of the radio DJ, a home-grown personality in his own right that gave a station a distinctive edge over any other competition.  The clock hour, a program scheduling tool that specified every element of a station’s programming within a given time frame, soon emerged as a way to keep order within a program.

Growth and Stabilization: 1955-1990

Radio stations more than doubled during this period, and the Top-40 format became popular enough to tempt record promoters to bribe DJs to play selected music (an illegal practice known as payola). The idea that prompted payola was that the more a record was played on air, the more that record would sell.  Format specialization continued to grow even into the network level.  ABC, which was imitated by the other networks, soon splintered into four different formats for its 1300 affiliate stations.


The most significant development to radio, however, happened in 1970 with the final emergence of FM as a mass medium.  FM licenses were easier to get than AM, and in 1965 the FCC passed the nonduplication rule, which prevented AM-FM sister stations from duplicating more than 50 percent of the AM content to its sister FM station.  Faced with these factors, and the fact that FM had  a much better sound quality, FM stations became an attractive commodity.  By 1990, FM had captured over 70 percent of the national radio audience.

Country music became the most popular radio format, followed by adult contemporary, while AM became the home to news-talk, oldies, and religious stations.  National Public Radio (NPR) went on the air in the early 1970s as the country’s first non-commercial network; by 1980 it had over 160 affiliates and was reaching five million people weekly.  Its two most successful offerings are its daily news programs, “Morning Edition” and “All Things Considered.”

The Volatile 1990s

An unprecedented era of station consolidation began in 1994 when an FCC ruling upped the number of stations a company could own to 20 AM and 20 FM stations, and also allowing holdings of up to four stations in a single market.  Congress later passed the Telecommunications Act of 1996 which completely eliminated the number of stations a company could own and also upped the number of allowable single-owned stations within a single market to eight.

The overall philosophy that first guided the development of radio was localism.  Radio stations were, in principle, licensed primarily to serve the public interest of those within the listening area of the station.  Today, however, continuing station mergers and acquisitions by large corporations has greatly diminished the localist philosophy.  A corporatist view now commands center stage, which essentially advocates the idea that the public interest is whatever interests the public the most.




DEFINING FEATURES OF RADIO    

portable – small and convenient enough to go anywhere, anytime
supplemental – most listening occurs while doing something else: driving, working, studying
universal --  most homes have six radios with one in almost every car; 75% of us listen daily
selective – radio is a niche medium, with specialized formats attracting narrowly defined audiences; only 2 or 3 % of the available audience is usually sufficient to generate a profit


ORGANIZATION OF THE RADIO INDUSTRY

There are about 12,500 radio stations in the United States, many of which use network programming (wherein all affiliates carry the same program at the same time) and/or syndication services (stations decide themselves when to use program content); in practice, however, most radio stations broadcast whatever content they get whenever it suits them best.

Local Stations, Nets, and Syndicators

Network radio, a dominant force in the 1930-42, has greatly diminished in its role as a content provider.  Today the leading networks (ABC, Westwood, and Premiere) generally limit what they offer to news and public affairs programming, and, of course, limited national advertising.

By contrast, syndicated shows now enjoy an all-time demand, such as the programs based on “stars” such as Rush Limbaugh, John Tesh, Ryan Seacrest, Zac Sang and the Gang, Dr. Laura Schlessinger, Glenn Beck, etc.  Other, more specialized, syndicated shows also enjoy a niche market such as the Comedy Network and NASCAR.

AM and FM Stations

Everything being equal, AM (amplitude modulation) signals travel further than FM (frequency modulation) signals, especially at night.  With AM listenership on decline, FM radio commands about 75 percent of the total audience.

AM radio has three channel classifications:

. clear -- a single dominant station designed to provide service over a wide area, almost
always urban, and broadcasting with 50,000 watts of power

.  regional -- a channel shared by many stations that serve fairly large areas

.  local -- a channel designed to be shared by a large number of stations that broadcast only
to their local communities

FM, though not as powerful as AM, does have these significant technical advantages:

            .  superior sound quality
            .  less likely to be affected by outside interferences (storms)

Like AM, FM stations are also organized by classes in a descending order of output power--

an FM class “C” station (100,000 watts), for example, has more power than a class “B” or “A” station.




Thursday, November 2, 2017

Underbelly of the Movie Industry (from Cinematic Listology):

Things the Film Industry Doesn’t Want You to Know About

Cinematic Listology By Ashe Cantrell on September 8 |

You may already be a film industry cynic. Maybe you think Hollywood is a barren wasteland, devoid of creativity and originality. Maybe you’re sick of seeing talented people get ignored and vapid hacks get splashed all over the trades. Maybe you’re tired of 3D everything and having to re-buy your movies every five to ten years.

I’m not here to dissuade you of any of that. Hell no, I’m here to make it worse. Get ready, because this is some of the rottenest shit of which the film industry is capable. These are the things so terrible that Hollywood has to cover them up, lest God see their sin and smite them accordingly (and keep various government entities and lawyers off their backs, of course). If you still had any kind thoughts toward Hollywood, I suggest you prepare yourself for crushing disappointment.

Tricky Hollywood Accounting


Here’s a basic example of Hollywood Accounting: A studio makes a movie. The studio distributes the movie itself, and although the distributor is technically a separate company, they both belong to the same parent company. Also, the distribution arm sets whatever fees it wants. If they want to charge themselves eleventy quintillion dollars for distribution, they totally can. Then, even if the film earns billions of dollars in box office receipts, they’re still technically in debt (to themselves) and thus haven’t turned a profit.

Sound ridiculous? It happens all the freaking time. David Prowse, the guy who was in the Darth Vader costume in the original trilogy of Star Wars (before being ousted by that douche Hayden Christensen in the special edition) has never been paid for Return of the Jedi because it hasn’t turned a profit after nearly 30 years. That’s after dozens of home video and theatrical re-releases. (All the merchandising money goes to Lucas directly, of course.)

Similarly, someone leaked Warner Bros.’ accounting sheet for Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix onto the internet, showing that the film that had grossed about $1 billion worldwide had lost $167 million on paper.

Winston Groom, the writer of Forrest Gump was told that the film based on his work wasn’t profitable. Of course, he got the last laugh when they came to him asking if they could turn the sequel, Gump and Co. into a film as well, and he reportedly told them, ”I cannot, in good conscience, allow money to be wasted on a failure.” In other words, “Go fuck yourself.”

And then there’s Art Buchwald, whose spec script got stolen by Paramount (remember that, it’s going to come up later), and got turned intoComing to America. When he took them to court and sued for a percentage of the profit, Paramount was totally cool with it, because according to their books, it hadn’t made any kind of profit, so they didn’t owe him one red fucking cent. The judge later ruled that it was “unconscionable” for Paramount not to pay Buchwald something in a settlement. Otherwise, he’d have to ask Paramount to open their books for the courts to review. Paramount quickly backed down and settled with Buchwald instead.

Extorting Theaters

Ever wondered why popcorn, something that costs $.25 a bag on Planet Earth, costs $7 at the movies? Here’s a hint: it’s not because of the reconstituted pig flesh that they call butter.

Movie theaters have had to look for more and more ways to increase revenue, like jacking up the prices of things at the concessions stand and adding a dozen ads to the beginning of each film. Why, when new releases are constantly breaking records and making obscene amounts of money? Because film studios don’t like the theaters getting their beak wet.

Movie theaters operate on a kind of sliding scale. The first weekend of a movie’s release, the profit is split heavily in the studio’s favor, typically around an 80/20 split. The second weekend, it may change to a 70/30 scale, and so on. It’s even rumored that some major blockbuster films like Avatar are released with 90/10 or even 95/5 splits. Now keep in mind that exceptionally few films do very well after the first week of their release. Today, sometimes it's 100/0.

So why do the theaters take these awful deals? Because if they don’t, the studio is under no obligation to lease their films to that theater, so they can just totally bounce if they want to. If that happens, the theater has no films to show at all, and then what have they got to draw people in? Overpriced hot dogs?

Fake Reviews


Have you ever seen a trailer for a shitty movie on TV and it has one of those blurbs that’s like “…stunning…,” and maybe a soothing voice reads it aloud? You may joke with your friends that the rest of that quote is “a stunning pile of horse shit.” Turns out, that actually happens. It’s not a joke at all. Marketing departments just plain don’t give a fuck. For example, one critic’s review of Live Free or Die Hard got shortened from “hysterically overproduced and surprisingly entertaining” to “hysterically… entertaining.” Sometimes they’ll even take the blurb from parts of the review where the critic was referring to a different movie entirely or the genre as a whole, like when a blurb used for Definitely, Maybe turned out to be from the critic’s description of the romantic comedy genre as a whole and not his actual thoughts on the film.

Another fun trick Hollywood likes to use is trying to woo critics with free screenings, food, set visits, and other goodies. The people who take the bait are called quote whores. If your film needs a good review, they’re there to give it. One of the most infamous is a critic named Earl Dittman, who is the film critic for a publication called Wireless Magazine. You’ve probably never heard of Wireless, and that’s because they apparently have zero subscribers and no web presence, and yet that doesn’t stop film studio marketing departments from using his blurbs like they’re gold. In fact, Dittman was the center of a lot of controversy when an e-mail he sent to Fox contained not one, but ten different blurbs for the movie Robots and instructions for the studio to pick and use whichever one they liked best. But at least Earl Dittman’s a real guy.

David Manning, however, is a different story.  Sony Pictures created the fictitious Manning and claimed that he worked for The Ridgefield Press, a real newspaper. Unfortunately, they didn’t foresee someone actually asking the paper if they’d ever heard of the guy, because, you know, they hadn’t. All of his blurbs were concocted by Sony Pictures’ marketing department. Fox pulled similar shit, using footage of employees pretending to be ordinary movie-goers for promotional material.

In the spirit of Hollywood review tactics, I’m going to build a review of my most recent articles from an e-mail that the Film School Rejects editors sent me.
“Ashe, we’re getting really sick of telling you this, but if you… don’t… keep… posting these ridiculous[ly wonderful]… articles, we’re going to have to let you go.” -Cole Abaius, Film School Rejects

–~~~~~~~~~~~~–

Script Theft Accusations


Remember Art Buchwald from earlier? The guy who almost got screwed by Paramount before a judge stepped in and told them to cut that shit out? Well, there’s a little more to that story. A few years before the big court case, Buchwald was already a successful humor writer and satirist, even winning himself a Pulitzer for his work. Then he set his sights on Hollywood, and he pitched Paramount an idea for a movie about an African prince who moves to America to find a bride. He suggested Eddie Murphy as a lead actor. (That’s right, kids. People used towant Eddie Murphy in their movies.)

Paramount took the pitch, but then had trouble getting it off the ground. Eventually, the rights returned to Buchwald and he pitched it to Warner Bros. Shortly after they began work on it, though, Warner Bros. killed the project. Turns out, there was a similar film going into production at Paramount. It was a movie about an African prince who moves to America to find a bride. Oh, and it starred Eddie Murphy, who was also given writing credit. That movie, of course, was Coming to America. Buchwald was furious and immediately took Paramount to court, which instigated the events discussed back in the Hollywood Accounting entry. So Buchwald didn’t just get screwed, he almost got double-screwed. But he’s not the only one.

Turns out, some of those crazy people who constantly crop up and say Hollywood producers ripped off their scripts aren’t so crazy. In fact, it turns out that it’s a dirty little secret of Hollywood’s that stealing scripts is almost commonplace. Jeff Grosso wrote a script about his life as a professional Texas Hold ‘Em player and had it turned down by Miramax, only for them to turn around and begin production on an identical project that became the Matt Damon film Rounders. Another writer, Reed Martin, pitched his idea and, like Buchwald, even recommended the perfect actor for his script– Bill Murray. Months later, an exceptionally similar movie, Broken Flowers (starring Bill Murray, of course), went into production without Martin. Although Martin’s claim survived many attempts at dismissal, it saw a trial in which a jury sided with the studio. Due to the high cost of the appeals process (an approximated $800,000), he has not filed an appeal.

The problem is that while scripts can be copyrighted, ideas cannot. So, if Hollywood gets pitched an idea and likes it, but doesn’t want to deal with the whole “paying for the script” thing, they can just hire someone to write another script based on “their” idea. Since they have much bigger, meaner lawyers than your average spec script writer, the writer kinda gets boned. So even the mythical “original idea” in Hollywood? Yeah, it may not be so original after all.

Writers Don't Come Up With the Ideas
The Complaint:

"There are no original ideas! Look at the top-grossing 25 films of the 2000s -- 23 were remakes or adaptations! How lazy can these writers get?"

"I made almost enough money writing Transformers 2 to drink away the shame of having written Transformers 2."

The Problem:

Even if you know nothing about how movies get made, you know that there are very specialized tasks -- the sound guy is an expert in microphones and audio but probably couldn't be trusted to do stunts. And, you assume that when it comes to thinking up the ideas for what happens in the movie, somewhere it's all just some writer hunched over a keyboard -- a professional who is an expert in story, plot and character.

Not so.

In almost all cases, the initial ideas for movie plots don't come from screenwriters at all, but from producers (basically, the people in charge of the money side of the project). So most of the movies playing in your nearest theater didn't come from some writer thinking up a story he wanted to tell -- they came from some producer saying, "There hasn't been a ThunderCats movie yet, has there?"

"Avatar was full of cat people -- we can't miss!"
At that point, the producer and whoever else is involved (other producers, maybe a famous actor if they're lucky) will then hammer out a rough idea for the movie that will appeal to at least two of the four market demographics (young males, young females, older males, older females). So if it's an action movie aimed completely at young males, you throw a romance in there for the ladies. It's only then that they will give a screenwriter a call. In other words, in most Hollywood films, the writer is basically there to fill in the dialogue holes and think of clever catchphrases for Ryan Reynolds to say every time he socks a guy in the jaw.

For Example ...

The Halloween franchise wasn't cooked up by a plucky man named John Carpenter who had a dream about a man in a creepy mask. Instead,two producers approached him after they decided it would be cool to have a movie about a psycho stalking babysitters.

It's a tale as old as time.
So what about those screenplays that your friend working at the video store is constantly writing, in hopes they will some day get made and star a naked Natalie Portman? In reality, even the great ones are treated as spec scripts (basically, a literary audition). The script is proof to the people in charge that the writer is, for the most part, not illiterate. So if you submit a powerfully emotional piece that deftly explores the facets of love and loss, you might impress someone enough to get a job co-writing Transformers 4.

On the rare occasion that an original script does get picked up for production, it's likely to get swept up by one of the big franchises. I, Robot was initially an original script called Hardwired that no one would touch until a famous Asimov title was attached to it. Die Hard 2, 3 and 4,Ocean's Twelve and Starship Troopers were all original ideas that were snapped up and rebranded as franchises. So if you're working on a passion project, maybe it's time to let the dream die and just start focusing on a gritty reboot of She-Ra.

Creativity counts for a hell of a lot less than brand awareness.

Everything Is Simplified for the International Market
The Complaint:

"Even the original movie ideas are just mindless explosions and CGI! Why does every other movie have to look like a video game and make me feel like a moron?"

The Problem:

If you're reading this, then those movies weren't made with you in mind. They were made for the international box office (Transformers 2 made $400 million overseas, for instance). Now, before you even have a chance to think it, we are not saying foreign audiences are stupid. The movies made in their home countries, for them, are no doubt just as deep and thoughtful as any Best Picture winner.

No doubt.
What we're saying is that to make a movie that appeals equally to American, Japanese, Korean, German and Mexican teenagers, you need to simplify that shit down to things they all understand equally. Anything dealing with, say, the subtle trials and hardships of everyday life in the American Midwest is going to be totally lost on someone from the other side of the planet.

But there is one thing that everyone in the world can understand and sympathize with, no matter what their culture or ethnicity: The need to run away if you are being chased by giant robots.

Forget math -- robot threat is the universal language.
Likewise, foreign audiences also aren't as picky about good writing (a lot of it will be lost in the translation to subtitles anyway) or clever comedy (which is highly culturally specific). So if you're a studio executive who is choosing between financing a poignant coming of age film about an orphan ranch hand in East Texas or a film about a giant radioactive thunderstorm that gives people superpowers, chances are you're not going to go with the poignancy.

For Example ...
Everybody chuckled at how over-the-top stupid 2012 was. And it did a "meh" $166 million in American box office. 

Overseas? It made $604 million.

"Yah! Ve liken das tidal waves unt der evil vice fuhrer."
By the way, it was that lust for foreign currency, not a sudden loss in patriotism, that was behind the G.I. Joe movie replacing its "all-American hero" with a multinational group of soldiers with a strangely American task force name.


Movie Projects Get Killed for Bad Reasons
The Complaint:

"Man, whatever happened to that Halo movie Peter Jackson was going to make? Or (insert any of a hundred impossibly cool movies rumored on Ain't It Cool five years ago that were never mentioned again)?

Caption Dept. Note: Sorry, we can't think of anything that would make this picture more ridiculous.
The Problem:

"Development Hell" is what happens when a movie gets indefinitely stuck at some point during the moviemaking process and gets lost. Now, sometimes it's nobody's fault -- Halo would be expensive and at this point would look like a cheap Avatar knockoff. But the kicker is that sometimes the studios banish projects to oblivion intentionally.

"Pay our hefty ransom, or you'll never see your precious Halo movie again."
For Example ...

Hollywood studios generally buy 10 times as many scripts as they make into movies, which means they currently own exclusive rights to a shitload of films that will never see production. And in most cases, they won't let anyone else have them. E.T., The Matrix, Pulp Fiction and Star Wars are all films that you never would have seen because the studios that owned them were content to sit on each forever. They were saved only because someone convinced another studio to re-buy them, usually at a higher price.

Sometimes the reasons for stalling a project are even more duplicitous. According to screenwriter Howard Meibach, in the 90s Disney bought a script for a hockey-related movie that was getting attention in Hollywood simply because it had a different hockey movie in production and "[didn't] want another studio to get it." Thanks to Disney's unapologetic cock-blocking, we will never know what the actual film was about.

We have our guesses.

And finally, sometimes studios will sit on entirely completed movies. We've told you about the time a studio made an abysmal low-budget adaptation of The Fantastic Four it never intended to release, simply because it wanted to keep the rights. It turns out this sort of thing is more common than you'd expect: When legendary producer Harvey Weinstein was in charge of Miramax, he used to buy exclusive rights to foreign films and then push back their releases indefinitely as part of a scheme to get bonuses from Disney. He bought the rights to distribute Jet Li's movie Hero and then didn't, releasing it a full two years later only when Quentin Tarantino finally intervened.

After what we can only imagine was one hell of a sword fight.

OK, so you probably don't care about a crappy superhero B-movie or some foreign flick about old people falling in love or, like, rain (look, we don't see a lot of foreign movies). But how about Mike Judge's movie Idiocracy? 

Despite how much America loves Judge for Beavis and Butthead and Office Space, 20th Century Fox did everything it could to bury his movie. It tried to weasel out of a theatrical release for over a year and finally did the bare minimum to fulfill its contract by opening Idiocracy in seven cities, with no trailers or press kits.

Merchandising Supremacy
The Complaint:
"Wait, Pixar is making freaking Cars 2? Of all the original films they could be working on or, hell, of all the sequels they could be making, they're making a goddamned Cars 2? Why?"
The Problem:
Five billion dollars. That's how much money Disney has made off of Cars merchandise (and that article is two years old -- hell, it could be 7 billion by now).

The inevitable conclusion here is a movie about the secret lives of Happy Meal toys.
That's why Up, despite being wildly critically acclaimed from the get-go, actually caused Pixar's stock to go down before its release; investors thought the lack of merchandise would make it bomb and wondered what the point of the movie was without the toys.
You can't overstate how huge merchandising looms in the process of getting a blockbuster made. Film merchandising is a $132 billion industry worldwide, and it's also a pretty sweet deal for filmmakers -- they don't have to actually manufacture or sell anything; they just charge a licensing fee and use that money to help fund their movie. So if the toys don't sell, the merchandiser has to take the loss, not the studio. Awesome, right?
Well, no. The more expensive films get (and they're getting pretty expensive), the more the industry becomes dependent on merchandising. So parents concerned about Hollywood's influence on their children will be happy to know that today it's nigh impossible to get a kids movie greenlit if your characters don't look like something you can put inside a Happy Meal.

REJECTED.
For Example ...
Take a look at what will probably be next year's biggest blockbuster:
Seriously. Someone is making a $200 million movie based on some pieces of plastic and a bunch of holes, some of which will be played by Liam Neeson and Rihanna. There's also a remake of Clue and a movie adaptation of motherfucking Monopoly directed by Ridley Scott.
And don't get us started on the product placement. Today, branding experts read drafts, meet with the writers and even write new dialogue. That's why you have scenes in which John Connor drives a Chrysler in the post-apocalyptic future of Terminator Salvation, even though there are about 67 solid reasons why that doesn't make any sense. You can look forward to seeing a hell of a lot more of that in the future.

"You made a time machine ... out of a box of Kellogg's Rice Krispies?"
Copyright Cinematic Listology 

Link for "What part of the country are you from?"


http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2013/12/20/sunday-review/dialect-quiz-map.html?_r=0

Understanding TV Ratings

There are two questions which Nielsen Media Research ratings answer about TV viewing: "Who is watching TV?" and "What are they watching?" These are not easy questions to answer, and we use research methods, which have been developed and refined over many years to provide answers every single day.

Knowing who is watching
The way that Nielsen Media Research finds out about who is watching is to measure what a sample of television viewers are watching. For our national ratings estimates, we use a sample of more than 5,000 households, containing over 13,000 people who have agreed to participate. Since there are over 110 million households with TVs in the U.S., it might seem that a sample of 5,000 is just not big enough to represent the nation.

Actually, a representative sample doesn't have to be very large to
represent the population it is drawn from. For example, you don't
need to eat an entire pot of vegetable soup to know what kind of
soup it is. A cup of soup is more than adequate to represent what is
in the pot. If, however, you don't stir the soup to make sure that all
of the various ingredients have a good chance of ending up in the
cup, you might just pour a cup of vegetable broth. Stirring the soup
is a way to make sure that the sample you draw represents all the
different parts of what is in the pot.

While a sample doesn't have to be very large to represent the
population, the sample does need to be selected in a way, which
gives all members of the population the same chance of being
chosen.

If 50% of the vegetable pieces in a huge pot are carrot cubes, the only way to know it for sure would be to examine and count the contents of the entire pot. Let's say we stir well and pour a cup of soup with 10 vegetable pieces in the cup. If sampling were a perfect process, we would get five carrot cubes out of ten pieces. What actually happens is that we usually get close to five
carrot cubes-sometimes a little more and sometimes a little less and sometimes exactly five. It is possible, but really unlikely, to stir well and get no carrot pieces-or to get all carrot pieces. So we could get a rough estimate of the proportion of carrots in the pot from counting what is in the cup.

If we wanted a closer estimate, we would take a larger sample. Imagine if we stirred well and then poured out enough soup to contain 5,000 vegetable pieces. We probably wouldn't get exactly 2,500 carrot pieces, but the chance of getting no carrots at all is very remote. In fact, according to sampling theory and a very tasty laboratory test, 19 out of 20 times we take a wellstirred sample of soup containing 5,000 vegetable pieces; we get between 48% and 52% carrots.
There is no guarantee that the percentage of carrots in a sample of this size will be between 48% and 52% (one time in 20 it will be outside this range, but usually not far outside this range). The same sampling errors apply to a representative sample of television viewers.

Measuring homes, TVs, programs, commercials and people
In order to provide all the information, which the TV and advertising industries need, Nielsen Media Research actually measures all of the above. We report the amount of TV usage on every set in a sample household - those are homes which have agreed to participate in our research for a specific period of time.

Just like a recipe in which several ingredients have to be combined, Nielsen Media Research constructs TV ratings from several different sources of information.

Measuring TV sets
Identifying TV programs

In a specially selected sample of homes, Nielsen Media Research
technicians install metering equipment on TV sets, VCRs and cable boxes
(and even satellite dishes). The Nielsen Media Research meters
automatically and invisibly keep track of when the sets are on and what
the sets are tuned to. These meters are connected to a central "black box,"
which is actually a very small computer and modem. Information from
the meters is collected by the black box, and in the middle of the night all
the black boxes call in their information to our central computers.

For us to know what is on the channel at the time it is tuned, we have to collect a large amount of information every day about what is on every TV station and cable channel all across the country. A network may schedule a program, but some stations that usually carry that network may not carry that program, or may delay the program and show it at a different time. Nielsen Media Research's primary source of information about which programs are airing for
each station or cable channel comes from a very special coded ID number that is part of almost every TV picture-a series of lines and dots in the top edge of the picture which labels the program and episode. Nielsen Media Research developed and patented this system, which we call AMOL, or Automated Measurement Of Line-ups. All across the country, we have sites where TV stations are monitored and the program ID codes are detected and collected. Each night, these monitoring sites connect up to our central computer and download the information. We compile the electronic program information and compare it to other sources of information we have already received. If there are discrepancies, we call TV stations and cable operators to verify what actually was aired. Keeping track of what is on TV is also done with the help of program listings provided by networks, stations and cable systems, as well as published TV listings.

We track more than 1,700 TV stations and 11,000 cable systems. With this database as a starting point, we can credit tuning and viewing to all of the networks, syndicates, cable networks, TV stations and cable systems involved in providing TV programming to the viewing public.

Identifying commercials
Although there are many TV programs, there are even more commercials. Keeping track of what commercials are on TV is another service provided by Nielsen Media Research. Using a special passive TV signal identification technology, commercials on TV stations are continuously monitored and converted into a digital "fingerprint". These fingerprints are then compared to a
computer file of fingerprints from thousands of different commercials and automatically identified whenever possible (which is about 95% of the time). The other 5% of the time, recordings  of unmatched commercials are sent to a central office to be viewed and properly credited. This information is used to produce reports detailing when and where TV commercials actually aired.

Measuring People
This is the main ingredient in the recipe for ratings: who is watching? When we combine the measurement of who is watching with what channel is tuned and what program is on that channel, we can credit viewing to a program.

Nielsen Media Research measures who is watching programs, which reach the entire nation with the Nielsen People Meter. In our national sample, we install set meters which have an attachment called a "People Meter". The People Meter is a box, about the size of a paperback book, which is placed on or near each TV set.

The box has buttons and lights, which are assigned to each person who live in the household (with additional buttons for guests). There is also a remote control to operate the people meter from anywhere in the room.

When a viewer begins watching TV, they push their button, changing their indicator light from red to green. When they finish watching, they push their button again and the indicator changes back to red. Periodically, the lights flash to remind people to check to make sure that the information in the people meter is accurate.

Information from the people meters is combined with set tuning information and relayed to Nielsen Media Research each night.

National and local measurement
So far, we have been describing how Nielsen Media Research measures audiences to programs, which reach the entire nation. But the television system in the United States also requires a local measurement of how programs perform in specific markets. In fact, Nielsen Media Research measures more than 200 individual local television markets in addition to the national measurement service. There are many important differences in the way Nielsen Media Research measures local television.

Diaries: Another way to know who is watching
To measure the audiences for local television, Nielsen Media Research gathers viewing information using TV diaries, booklets in which samples of viewers record their television viewing during a measurement week. We conduct diary measurement for each of the 210 television markets in the country four times each year, during February, May, July, and November: (You may have heard of these as "sweep" months, in which we conduct a complete diary measurement across the nation.)

The diary requests that viewers write down not only who watched, but also what program and what channel they watched.

We have tried to make the task of filling out a diary as easy as possible by asking people to report what they do by quarter hours (instead of minute-by-minute). Once the diaries are filled out, viewers mail them back to us and we transfer the information into our computers in order to calculate ratings.

In 50+ of the largest markets, we have a sample of homes with set meters (not people meters), which provide the tuning status (set on/off, channel and time) of TV sets in the home. We collect information about who is viewing from separate samples of homes in these markets with diaries for each TV set. We combine the meter and diary information in a way which projects the diary viewing data adjusted to the meter tuning data.

Information Accuracy
No measurement system is perfect, whether it measures the entire population or just a sample. Errors are always a possibility. When measurement is based on a sample, there is the additional source of error, which comes from sampling variation (some samples are going to be a bit high, others a bit low).

For this reason, Nielsen Media Research regularly crosschecks the information obtained from different samples and different measurement methods. Remarkably, the ratings produced from more than 100,000 diaries collected from all markets during each sweep month have been similar
to the ratings based on 5,000 People Meter homes for the same period of time. Different measurement methods, completely separate samples-and a vast difference in sampling size-yet they both produce similar estimates of audience.

In addition to this, we have ongoing audits and quality checks to make sure that all of our procedures are working correctly.

Nielsen Media Research Families
The Nielsen Media Research families are a cross-section of the households with television sets all across America. Because we have selected them in a way, which gives every household an equal chance of being picked, we have all
kinds of households in the sample. This means that we have homes from all fifty states, from cities and towns, suburbs and rural areas. We have people who own their homes and people who live in apartments. Some homes in the panel
have children and some don't.

Various ethnic and income groups are represented. When we check the characteristics of households in our samples against the U.S. Census data, we find that our samples look very much like the population. Of course, the match is not perfect. When you draw a representative sample, it is usually close to the population on a given characteristic.

Between 11 and 12 percent of the Nielsen Media Research samples are African American, for example, and this matches the percentage of all TV households in the United States, which are classified as African American.

Let's look at the individual samples in terms of African American representation. National People Meter Sample -- There are 5,000 households in this sample. The number fluctuates daily as about 300 households come in and out of the sample every month. Of this number, nearly 550 households are African American, or about 11 percent of the total.

Sample Selection
Our sample homes are selected strictly through chance. Naturally we'd like to accommodate people who offer to be in our sample, but doing so would violate basic laws of sampling practice. The sample would immediately become biased because those who asked to join may be systematically different from the population at large.

Instead, we carefully draw our sample in a way that offers every U.S. television household an equal chance of being selected. Once the homes are selected and agree to participate, Nielsen Media Research protects their privacy by keeping their identities confidential.

Representative Samples
If every member of the population has an equally good chance of being in the sample, then this makes it a representative sample. Through statistical theory (and many years of practical experience which is consistent with that theory), we know that fairly drawn (or random) samples vary in usually small ways from the population. Over time these small differences tend to average out.

We check our samples in various ways. Where we do know something about the characteristics of the entire population (thanks to U.S. Census Bureau data), we compare our sample to the population. We find that although the samples aren't identical to the population, they are about as close to it as statistical theory predicts. The most important thing to check in our samples is the
television viewing information. Although no one has measured the viewing of the entire population, we do have ways to cross check against other samples and other methods of measurement. We regularly compare our National People Meter audience data to the combined information from the diaries all across the 210 markets we measure.

Occasionally, we do special studies called Telephone Coincidentals. In these tests, we call thousands of randomly selected telephone numbers and ask people if their TV sets are on and who is watching. This research provides a completely independent check on the amount of TV usage and viewing, and
when we have found some differences, it has helped us zero in on ways to improve our ongoing measurement systems.

Viewing Confirmation
Confirming whether people are actually watching television is really one of the most difficult questions we face. Some of the information we measure is possible to check by independent means. Stations carry programs and we can observe that when it happens. TV sets are tuned to particular stations and not to others, and we can measure that when it happens.

The only person who knows when viewing occurs is the viewer. Viewing is not necessarily looking at a TV; it is not necessarily being in the room with a TV; it is something that only the viewer can define. This is why we use the diary and the people meter; so that viewers can tell us what they do.

We conduct special research among former members of our TV meter and diary ratings samples to learn more about how they actually watch television and how accurately they have reported their viewing. With the help of the viewing public, we are constantly learning more about the partnership between TV and its audience.

Ratings Usage
Nielsen Media Research's role is to measure both what is transmitted and what is received. By doing this, we provide the programmers and advertisers with vital feedback on their audience. Nielsen Media Research ratings are used like currency in the marketplace of advertiser-supported TV. When advertisers want a commercial to reach an audience, they need to place it in TV programs, which deliver an audience. The more audience a program delivers, the more the commercial time is worth to advertisers. So the amount charged for advertising is usually a negotiated rate per thousand viewers multiplied by the Nielsen
Media Research audience estimate (in thousands).

Programs are expensive to produce, whether they attract large audiences or not. In the long run, TV programmers can't pay more for a program than they can earn from selling advertising in it.

Program Cancellations
Occasionally some viewers find that a program they watch gets canceled. By estimating the audience, our information helps programmers keep the popular shows on TV, and it also helps them make the difficult decisions to cancel unpopular shows.

The irony of the mass medium of television is that a program with "only" a few million viewers may be an unpopular program. It may take ten million viewers for a network or nationally syndicated program to be popular enough to be a business success. Every time a program is canceled, a few million viewers feel betrayed. But if programmers tried to keep all programs going, the shows that lose money would eventually put the programmers out of business. Nielsen Media Research ratings are also used by non-commercial television. They can learn about the audience they serve and make better programming decisions.

Narrative Model:



Exposition
What is the setting? Who are the characters and what is there situation at the beginning of the play?

Inciting incident
What is the first thing that happens to set the story in motion? It is the first presentation of the major problem or obstacle in the story.

Rising Action
Name at least three things that happen that lead up to the climax. These should be events pertaining to the main problem.

Climax
How does the story get resolved? The climax answers the question, “Do the main character’s get what they want and how does this happen?”

Falling Action
What are the actions taken after the climax?

Denouement
What will become of the main characters? Do they change or go back to the way things always were? How have things changed?

Sample Stock Situations:

Some sample Stock Situations:

Taming of the beast/brute
The locked box
Invaded community
Scientist creates perfect spouse/monster/friend/etc.
Hidden eavesdropper
Boy-meets-girl-meets-boy
Recognition by birthmark (or some other mark)
Team of three
Fish out of water
The ugly duckling becomes a beautiful swan
Love triangle
Sibling rivalry
Forbidden love

Stock characters:

http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/StockCharacters?from=Main.StockCharacter

Tip sheet for storytelling by Evan Smith (longtime TV producer and sitcom writer):


https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B2Dv4MQMdbN4c0RKbXhRU1JtNXM

Tricky accounting continues:

From The Hollywood Reporter:


Sylvester Stallone Suing Warner Bros. for Fraud and "Dishonesty"

by Eriq Gardner
Sylvester StalloneMike Windle/Getty Images

In the 1993 science-fiction film Demolition Man, Sylvester Stallone's character is brought out of a decades-long state of cryopreservation to pursue a nemesis. The actor himself has now wakened from a slumber of a different kind to take on Warner Bros. over its accounting of profits on the film. 
On Wednesday, through his loan-out company Rogue Marble, Stallone filed contract and fraud claims against the studio. In a complaint lodged in Los Angeles Superior Court, he alleges that the participation statement doesn't make sense while demanding a fuller accounting on Demolition Man, which also starred Wesley Snipes and Sandra Bullock. The film made about $58 million upon its theatrical release and much more in home video sales.
In taking on Warner Bros., Stallone is fighting the same studio that distributed 2015's Creed, which earned him an Oscar nomination. But the 70-year-old actor believes the time is right and is making a stab at doing something about "Hollywood Accounting" with the stated intention of helping others in the creative community.
"The motion picture studios are notoriously greedy," states the complaint. "This one involves outright and obviously intentional dishonesty perpetrated against an international iconic talent. Here, WB decided it just wasn't going to account to Rogue Marble on the Film. WB just sat on the money owed to Rogue Marble for years and told itself, without any justification, that Rogue Marble was not owed any profits. When a representative of Rogue Marble asked for an accounting, WB balked and then sent a bogus letter asserting the Film was $66,926,628 unrecouped. When challenged about this false accounting, it made a double-talk excuse, then prepared an actual profit participation statement for the same reporting period, and sent a check for $2,820,000 because the Film had in fact recouped its deficit."
According to the lawsuit, Stallone got 15 percent of defined gross once the picture earned $125 million. When Demolition Man earned more than $200 million, his take would escalate to 17.5 percent, and when it surpassed $250 million, his profit participation would climb to 20 percent.
Demolition Man, states the complaint, achieved at least $125 million, so Stallone asserts he's entitled to at least 15 percent.
Stallone says that after 1997, he got no profit participation statements until his agent reached out to Warners in 2014 to inquire. 
In January 2015, he received a short summary which noted an alleged deficit for the film and stated that no payment was due. Stallone's company then questioned the validity of numbers "because they did not make any sense." Soon, a second statement came along with a $2.8 million check. It was only one page. There wasn't much detail.
"Rogue Marble alleges on information and belief that it is owed additional contingent compensation on the Film," states the complaint.
The actor is seeking an unknown amount of restitution for the alleged contractual breach and also targeting much greater damages with a fraud claim. Stallone will be attempting to support the fraud claim by showing that the studio misrepresented and intentionally concealed facts. However, as the case moves forward, he'll likely need to demonstrate why such a claim isn't duplicative of the asserted contract breach.
Somewhat unusually, Stallone is also bringing a cause of action that alleges Warner Bros. has engaged in unfair business practices. The complaint characterizes the studio's conduct as "unscrupulous, unethical and offensive, and causes substantial injury to consumers" and "threatens or harms competition because other studios (that compete with WB) have their own agreements with profit participants and account using their own accounting methods. ... WB attempts to keep its accounting methods hidden from competitors and the public at large because revealing such methods will have an impact on competition."
Besides money, the actor wants injunctive relief. The complaint states, "Mr. Stallone is entitled to, among other things, a full accounting, an explanation of how this practice came to be, interest, damages, and an end to this practice for all talent who expect to be paid by WB for the fruits of their labor."
We've uploaded a full copy of the complaint. Stallone is represented by attorney Neville Johnson.
Warner Bros. had no comment.

Review Sheet for Quiz #3 (Tuesday, November 7, 2017)

Communication: Mass and Other Forms (blog + class + text) 
Elements in the communication process
            -source
            -encoding
            -message
            -channel
            -decoding
            -receiver
            -feedback
            -noise
The major mass media
Intrapersonal communication
Interpersonal communication
Small Group communication
Public communication
Mass communication
Common characteristics of traditional mass media outlets
            -complex and formal
            -multiple gatekeepers
            -need vast cash to operate
            -exist to make a profit
            -highly competitive
Future of mass media (segmentation, convergence, disintermediation)

Underbelly of Movie Industry (from the blog + class)
- Tricky Hollywood accounting
- Theater extortion
- Fake Reviews
- Script theft accusations
- Writers don't come up with ideas (producers do)
- Importance of the international market
- Development hell
- The importance of merchandising

Understanding TV Ratings (from blog + class)  
Nielsen Media Research
Rating vs Share (know that successful talk shows typically get low ratings but high shares)
Key Demo for entertainment = 18-49
Key Demo for news = 25-54
GRP = "gross ratings point"
HUT = households using television
TVHH = television households
C3= commercials watched within 3 days
Live + 7 = programs watched live or within 7 days of initial airing
Nielsen Family
Overnight Ratings (Set-top boxes)
Sweeps Months (November, February, May, July)
PeopleMeters
Diaries
Telephone Coincidentals


Drama & Storytelling 
Dramatic formula
- Exposition/introduction
- Rising Action
- Climax
- Falling Action
- Denouement
Stock characters
-reluctant hero
-comic sidekick
-nerdy girl
-wacky neighbor
-wise old man
Stock Situations
-bitter rivals
-dysfunctional nuclear family
-middle child
-team of three girls
-ill-fated lovers
Plot
Theme
Genres (tragedy, comedy, mystery, action/horror, reality)
Sports as drama

A list of prominent shows/production companies run by POC

Recognizing that the lack of diversity continues to be a problem in the entertainment media industry, it's important to be aware of thos...