Monday, November 13, 2017

App Rubric


Criteria
Poor
(F to D+)
Fair
(C- to B-)
Very Good
(B to B+)
Excellent
(A- to A+)
Did not show up for presentationPresented app, but problems are obvious

Presented app with only a few minor issuesExcellent overall presentation 
Concept of App 
App is poorly conceived in terms of usefulness, marketability.
App is generally ok, but we would have hoped for something more elaborate for a university course.

App is generally solid, but could be significantly better with some minor changes.
App is well conceived and has the potential to become quite popular. 



Graphical Design of App  



App is poorly designed. Aesthetically unpleasant.



Aesthetics of App are generally ok, but appear amateurish.




Aesthetics are quite good, but not quite of professional quality.




Aesthetics of App are of professional quality.

Functionality of App (Coding)
App does not work. 
App works, but is either simple or has glitches.
App works well and has no glitches; coding is   impressive.
App works well, has no glitches, and clearly has advanced coding.

Code sent 
.aia file with code not sent
.aia file with code sent, but coding is filled with errors. 
.aia file with code sent and coding is impressive with only minor errors.
.aia file with code sent and coding is excellent with no errors. 

Comments:













A list of prominent shows/production companies run by POC

Recognizing that the lack of diversity continues to be a problem in the entertainment media industry, it's important to be aware of thos...